Hello again! This post officially puts us back on schedule, and I’m so glad! There’s a lot to cover this week in PoA chapters three and four. We get to spend time at one of my favorite places: The Leaky Cauldron. No, not that Leaky Cauldron, silly, the one in London! Grab a butterbeer and have a sit.
(I’m currently packing in order to move to a new apartment. This weekend I found a binder full of re-read notes… from my last great (unpublished) re-read effort, prior to the release of Deathly Hallows back in 2007. The binder also contained the 400+ questions and my answers to Leaky’s pre-release prediction quiz, on which I scored a 65%. It was quite the trip down memory lane, let me tell you!)
Chapter Three: The Knight Bus
What Happens:
Moments after his angry exit from the Dursleys, reality dawns on Harry: he’s in quite the pickle. He’s temporarily homeless, has no Muggle money or way to communicate, and is probably expelled for his magic use. He’s just about to try flying to London when he sees a dark shadow in the corner. In his shock Harry trips and falls into the street. A huge triple-decker bus pulls up and its adolescent conductor, Stan Shunpike, invites Harry aboard. Harry lies about his name and climbs aboard, heading to London.
En route, the bus careens around the British countryside and Harry happens to notice the Daily Prophet’s article about Black, whom he’d seen on the Muggle news earlier. Stan and Ernie are incredulous that Harry doesn’t know about Black and quickly fill him in on the whole story. Black, of course, in an infamous murderer and big Voldemort supporter.
Once they pull up at the Leaky Cauldron, the surprises continue. Cornelius Fudge himself is waiting to greet Harry. Much to Harry’s surprise, Fudge appears to be personally involved in the search for Harry and insists that Harry won’t be punished for his loss of control back at the Dursley’s. Fudge will not, however, sign Harry’s Hogsmeade form. He orders Harry to stay at the inn or in Diagon Alley for the remainder of the holidays and bids Harry good night.
Commentary:
Fudge, you’re so very tricksy. At this point we really don’t know how big of an ass he’ll turn out to be; a bit bumbling, perhaps, but not nearly the sort of jerk he’ll devolve into within two books. Ugh. I’ll save most of my “boo-hiss Ministry” ranting for later books, but even at this early stage, it’s important to note that the Ministry is woefully inconsistent and willing to play favorites. Fudge, after all, is probably more concerned about Harry because of how things would look, not out of actual concern for Harry’s well-being. There’s a smidgen of elitism there too; Fudge is not quite polite to Stan or Tom the bartender, practically ignoring both of them. I mean, he could have at least been nice to them. I believe this demonstrates that in the Ministry (or Fudge’s head, at least) elitism isn’t just defined by one’s heritage, but by one’s socioeconomic class, too. I suppose Jo gets the credit for creating a believably unpleasant government system for the Wizarding World. Very often in fantasy literature (epic fantasy, especially) the author portrays the noble/ruling class as very nice and kind to the poor peasants beneath them, all the while acting as though feudalism as a legitimate form of government. As annoying as it is, this portrayal of a corrupt government in the MoM is, unfortunately, more realistic.
Harry is rather lucky that the Knight bus came zooming by. What would he have done? I suppose his plan of flying to London might have worked out, but how, exactly would he know how to get there?
And Stan! He’s going to get such a rough deal pretty soon and I feel so sorry for him. It is nice, I think, that Rowling follows the Law of Conservation of Characters; we’ll see Stan again at the Quidditch World Cup and hear of him again several times in HBP until finally, in DH, he’s Imperiused.
I won’t rant about those ridiculous shrunken heads in the film; I’ll just upset myself otherwise.
As Tom the bartender notes, Hedwig is an exceptionally smart owl. Owls in the Potter world are very smart creatures, and I can’t decide if it’s awesome or a little creepy how your owl knows your whereabouts almost before you do. Have owls ever been bewitched by Dark wizards to stalk people, like wire-tapping for wizards? Do owls have unions?
Chapter Four: The Leaky Cauldron
(This chapter gets its own song because the perfect one was so conveniently available.) Presenting: “Two Weeks to Myself” by Harry and the Potters
What Happens:
Harry enjoys his summer holidays more than he’d ever believed possible. He has loads of free time to explore Diagon Alley and finish his summer homework. Wandering around the shops he discovers the newly-released Firebolt broomstick and has to exercise a lot of self-control not to buy it.
While buying books at Flourish and Blotts, Harry notices a book about omens which mentions the Grim, a mysterious dog that indicates death is coming. The store manager urges Harry to ignore the book, and Harry does his best. A few days later he meets up with Hermione and who have come to do their school shopping. Hermione can’t stop chattering about all the new classes she’ll get to take this year. She decides to buy an owl and heads to the magical pet shop. Ron needs pet tonic for Scabbers, who’s looking ill, so he and Harry come along too.
Ron buys some medicine for Scabbers and Hermione, much to Ron’s horror, buys a huge ginger cat called Crookshanks. Crookshanks is antagonistic to Scabbers right away.
Back at the Leaky Cauldron everyone enjoys a lovely meal. Fred and George cause mischief, of course, stealing Percy’s Head Boy badge. Later in the evening Harry overhears Mr. and Mrs. Weasley arguing about whether or not to tell Harry something about Black. Mrs. Weasley is nearly panicked about Harry’s safety, but Arthur reassures her, arguing that Harry will be safest near Albus Dumbledore. Harry creeps back upstairs unheard and tries not to worry about Black.
Commentary:
There’s just so much to love about this chapter, mostly because I freaking love the Weasley family. This is one of the last times we’ll get to see them all together and all happy before things begin getting serious. Fred and George are harassing Percy, Molly is puffed up with pride for her children and worrying about their safety… it’s just lovely and normal for them.
This is, I believe, the only time we ever really hear anything about Florean Fortescue (of the ice cream parlor) before his murder in HBP. But even though poor Florean isn't a major character, we know that he's kind to Harry and runs a great store. So, when he's taken by Death Eaters, we're actually a little attached to him and it makes us more upset than the other random people they harm. Sad pandas.
In other news, there’s quite a bit of foreshadowing & set-up in this chapter (the Firebolt, the Grim, Hermione’s ridiculous class load, Scabbers’ ailing health, Crookshanks and Scabbers’ animosity) and some info-dumping about Black. Retrospectively, all the things we “know” about Black prior to this book’s climax are wrong, which really makes me feel terribly sorry for Sirius and the undue burden of guilt and shame he’s been carrying. Even after escaping in this book he’s not free to live a great life; he’ll always be in hiding. Even when the Order re-forms and he has comrades and visitors, things don’t get much better. Poor guy. Sirius’s story is probably one of the saddest in the series, eclipsed only by Neville.
Harry gets some mad props, I think, for not buying the Firebolt straight away. For a thirteen year old boy, he shows great maturity and foresight by not spending tons of money on something he doesn’t need. Well done, Harry!
This is a tiny thing, but remember that Percy owned Scabbers before Ron did. I can’t help but note the similarities between Peter Pettigrew and Percy Weasley; both them have dubious loyalty. Both are looking out only for themselves, which others around them step up and do the right thing… so it’s rather appropriate that they were together, perhaps.
That’s all for now! Make sure you bring some chocolate next week because we’re going to need it. Until then, stay warm!

"Sad pandas." That's hilarious. Is that from something?
ReplyDeletewww.inanechatter.net
And I'm with you on Sirius's sad story. I cry every time I read OotP, every time he and Harry talk about living together, when he calls him James right before he dies (I know that's in the movie, but is it in the book, too? My copy isn't handy.)...that stuff kills me.
ReplyDeleteZannah (hi there! *waves hello*)
ReplyDeleteHa! Glad you like it :-) Presenting: the evolution of sad pandas:
In high school my AP bio teacher had a picture of a very sad-looking monkey that he would put on the overhead when the class was acting ridiculous (which we often did. My friends and I are chatty!) So for a while I used "Sad monkey!" when I was upset about something.
But then a few months ago Matt from the Whomping Willows used "Sad Pandas" in one of his tweets. I liked it so much more than Sad Monkey that it became prominent in my "silly phrases" jargon :-)
and oh, poor Sirius. No, the quote you're thinking of (Nice one, James!) isn't in the book, but I do like it. It's very bittersweet.
(waves back)
ReplyDeleteI love it. Thanks for the history lesson. I'd love to steal it (the phrase, not the history), but I don't know if I could pull it off. My blog is only read by my friends and family, and they call me out when I say something that doesn't sound like me. Sad. Oh! I say that all the time. Maybe it's not that big a jump to "sad pandas".
Maybe it'll go viral.
And to stay on topic (sort of), it's kinda nice when the movies add something good rather than take out something important. Like the fact that the locket isn't even MENtioned in the OotP (the movie). For example.
(Are you still following Leigh Butler's WoT reread?)
Zannah
www.inanechatter.net
Yes I am still following the WoT Re-read!! I love it. Leigh brings wit, sass, and insight to my Monday and Friday afternoons. I don't always comment as much as I used to. I figuree if I don't get within the first 50 comments I usually don't have time to read them all, and so I don't comment for fear of repeating what someone else already said.
ReplyDeleteI'm eagerly awaiting Mashiara, which is one of my favorite chapters in all of WoT (Nynaeve + Lan = love).
Being a nerd ftw!
I was so far behind when I found it that I've only just caught up. Commenting would have been a waste in most cases since everyone was reading the current comment thread.
ReplyDeleteNynaeve breaking her block and Nynaeve gathering the Malkieri for Lan are among my top ten scenes from the whole series. I was crying at the end of The Golden Crane the first time I read it.
And now I should apologize for hijacking your comment thread to talk about another blog altogether. Sorry.
I have a violent love/hate relationship with Percy. On the one hand, he really gets the short-end of the stick. I mean, Bill and Charlie seem to team up, Fred and George, even Ron and Ginny (in a more roundabout Ron-Harry-Hermione-Ginny way). He didn't/doesn't have that confidante, that extra-special familial connection to make him feel like A Weasley. Instead, he was the poor guy Fred and George (younger than him! how impertinant!)--and probably Bill and Charlie to some extent--picked on. As a result, he learned to work hard and fend for himself. So, when he has to choose between his dream, working at the Ministry, and his family, he chooses selfishly.
ReplyDeleteAt the same time, I don't want to go so far as to dress him in leather pants. I don't agree that "Selfishness must always be forgiven because there's no hope for a cure", so Percy's decision to leave his family disappoints me. He grew up in the Weasley (!) home and managed to avoid learning the whole LOVE lesson, which is somewhat impressive in a bad way. I want to hit him over the head for his insensitivity and ingratitude.
I am especially proud of him for learning his lesson by DH (yay for tons of dynamic characters!) because it was, apparently, a very difficult one for him. Harder (and far more important) than all of his N.E.W.T.s combined.
On a more general note, I love how Rowling uses Percy to show that even people who are not born and bred into evil, such as Draco, can have a hard time learning just what is Good in life. It's another way of showing that the world isn't split into Good Families and Bad Families.
D~
ReplyDeleteYou get extra gold stars for referencing this trope with such finesse. Well done.
Yeah, I know. Percy’s a prat, but it’s a lot of nature-nurture debate. But I would still argue that despite all the family dynamics, people have freedom, aka the ability to choose the good. That’s what humanity is about: we have free will. Percy chose selfishly. The reasons might be understandable and he’s therefore a more sympathetic character than Voldemort, but it doesn’t get him off the hook.
But you make a good point: the world isn’t split into Good and Bad people. Sirius says as much in OotP; he tells Harry “The world isn’t split into good people and death eaters.” Much of what OotP is about is the perverted sort of goodness that happens even when you’re not part of the Dark Side.
It is unlikely you will see this, but I found it on your FB page and am enjoying it, even though it was never finished. I've held off on commenting, but I had to comment on this:
ReplyDelete"Very often in fantasy literature (epic fantasy, especially) the author portrays the noble/ruling class as very nice and kind to the poor peasants beneath them, all the while acting as though feudalism as a legitimate form of government"
What fantasy have YOU been reading? Probably the only exception I can think of is Lord of the Rings, which doesn't really touch on class dynamics, but all the fantasy I've read portrays the ruling class (and often a not-thinly disguised 'Catholic' church analog) as corrupt, greedy and abusive, stealing and raping at will. But that might be because of the growing trend I've noticed towards 'gritty realism'.